LeetCode Wizard
"An invisible Electron desktop app wrapping ChatGPT and Claude that helps candidates cheat on coding interviews and online assessments, generating $15K/month."
Marketing Channels
Hacker News
Show HN thread generated strong positive response from frustrated job seekers; someone asked 'How did you market this?' but creator did not respond in thread
Unknown / not disclosed
The creator did not answer the direct question about marketing channels; the $15K/month suggests effective distribution but the method is undisclosed
Growth Levers
- Leverage the growing frustration with leetcode interviews as a marketing narrative
- Target developer communities, Discord servers, and Reddit where interview prep is discussed
- Position the product within the 'accelerationist' framing — breaking a broken system
- Add support for more interview formats (system design, behavioral) to expand the addressable market
- Build referral mechanics — job seekers who succeed are likely to recommend to peers
First Customer Strategy
The creator built a 'fairly simple' ChatGPT/Claude wrapper as an invisible Electron app. With $15K/month in revenue just a few months after launch, the product clearly tapped into strong latent demand from job seekers frustrated with leetcode-style interviews. The marketing strategy was not disclosed despite a direct question.
Pricing Insight
No specific pricing mentioned, but $15K/month from a few months of operation suggests either a substantial user base at a low price point or a smaller base at a premium. The product is described as a 'fairly simple' wrapper, suggesting high margins.
New Market Opportunities
- Anti-leetcode movement / interview reform advocacy Commenter wants everyone to cheat on leetcode interviews to force companies to rethink hiring, positioning the product as an accelerationist tool
- Broader AI-assisted interview tools Called it 'one of the better uses of LLMs,' suggesting the underlying technology could be applied to other assessment contexts
Key Takeaways
- • Simple wrappers around existing AI models can generate significant revenue ($15K/month) when they solve a specific pain point
- • Products that exploit broken systems can find enthusiastic audiences who view them as forces for positive disruption
- • The 'invisible Electron app' form factor is a key technical moat — undetectable by browser-based proctoring
- • Not disclosing marketing channels may be deliberate — the product's controversial nature may benefit from word-of-mouth in private communities
- • Developer frustration with leetcode interviews represents a massive, emotionally charged market opportunity
- • The ethical controversy around the product actually functions as free marketing — polarizing products generate organic discussion
Sentiment Analysis
3 PosNotable Quotes
"I honestly want everyone to cheat on these leetcode style interviews. I want that process to be broken and for the whole system to become completely ineffective, so that companies are forced to go back to actually putting some thought into hiring. — throwaway77385"
"What a great idea! Honestly probably one of the better uses of LLMs that I've seen. Wishing you continued success. — angoragoats"
"This is, IMO the kind of 'Accelerationism' that I can get behind :) System is broken, therefore let's make it 100% obvious that it's broken, so it can be totally rebuilt. — disqard"
"At the point in my life where I'm at I couldn't care less about this being unethical. — coldtrait"
Comments
0 totalNo comments yet.